Prabir Kumar Sasmal v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In Absentia application dismissed due to non-appearance of parties in Misc. Application Diary No. 880 of 2025.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Application Diary No. 880 of 2025 (Arising out of S.A. 199 of 2023 in DRT, Cuttack)
Order No. 09
11.11.2025
Prabir Kumar Sasmal … Appellant -VsState Bank of India & 3 Others … Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
None is present for the parties. Application is dismissed in default.
Copy of the Judgment/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s Website.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prabir Kumar Sasmal
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 191090008802025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court