Nitharshan Janakiraman v. Bank of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed the appeal as withdrawn upon recording a memo from the appellant stating that the matter had been settled out of court between the parties.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn upon recording the appellant's memo.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 7th Day of November , 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
AIR (SA) 435/2025
(Arising out of S.A.No.20/2024 On the file of DRT-III, Chennai)
Between
Nitharshan Janakiraman S/o Sri K. Janakiraman, No. 32 Golden Avenue, 1st Main Road, Keelkattalai, Chennai 600 117. … Appellant
And
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Maharashtra, Chennai Zonal Office, New No. 25 & 27, Old No.43, Akshaya Shanti, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. …Respondent
Counsel for Appellant : M/s. G. Vairava Subramanian Counsel for Respondents : Mr. A. Karthikeyan
ORDER
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nitharshan Janakiraman
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Maharashtra
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090004352025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court