V S Muralidharan v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed an application for condoning delay as withdrawn by the appellants, who expressed an intent to settle with the respondent bank. Consequently, the appeal was rejected.
What did the court decide?
IA 692/2024 dismissed as withdrawn; Appeal AIR (SA) 1586/2024 rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 01st Day of January, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 692/2024 (Condone Delay)
In
AIR (SA) 1586/2024
( Arising out of IA 715/2024 in SA 138/2024 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
Between
- V S Muralidharan
S/o.Sankunni Nair
Sourparnika (Veetikkathodiyil) Aliparamba, Malappuram, Kerala – 679 357, Proprietor, M/s. Priya Instant Foods, Door No.11/172, Aliparamba P.O. Anamangad Road, Perinthalmanna,
Malappuram, Kerala – 679 322
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V S Muralidharan
- appellant
Anoop Muralidharan
- appellant
Indira Muralidharan
- respondent
South Indian Bank Ltd
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090015862024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court