Anoop Muralidharan v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The debt recovery appellate tribunal dismissed an application for condoning delay as withdrawn by the appellants. Consequently, the underlying appeal was rejected.
What did the court decide?
IA 700/2024 dismissed as withdrawn; Appeal AIR (SA) 1585/2024 rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 01st Day of January, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan
CHAIRPERSON
IA 700/2024 (Condone Delay)
In
AIR (SA) 1585/2024
( Arising out of IA 1853/2024 in SA 369/2024 on the file of DRT-I, Ernakulam)
Between
- Anoop Muralidharan
S/o.V S Muralidharan Sourparnika (Veetikkathodiyil) Aliparamba, Malappuram, Kerala – 679 357
- Mrs. Prathyusha S
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anoop Muralidharan
- appellant
Mrs. Prathyusha S
- appellant
Mrs. Indira M
- respondent
South Indian Bank Ltd
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court