The appellant withdrew the miscellaneous appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, having paid the entire amount to the bank, which also undertook payment to the auction purchaser. The tribunal disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.
Appeal disposed of as withdrawn due to payment of entire amount and undertaking by the bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 21/2025
Between
Vijay Ratanlal Banthia … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorised Officer, Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Mr. Radhe Agrawal, Advocate for Appellant.
An Advocate for the Respondents is present.
…Respondent/s
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by the appellant for seeking urgent relief.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he is withdrawing the appeal.
In view of the fact that the entire amount has been paid to the bank and that the bank has also undertaken to pay sale consideration to the auction purchaser.
Hence, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-29
1
Vijay Ratanlal Banthia
The Authorised Officer, Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
