Hdfc Bank v. Narendra Kumar and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge dismissed the bank's appeal as infructuous because the matter between the parties had been settled.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed as having become infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1235/2023 Date: 21.04.2025
HDFC Bank Vs. Narendra Kumar & Anr.
Present: Shri Amit Shukla, counsel for the appellant-Bank, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent no. 1,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore, the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
The aforesaid averment has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and states that the matter has been settled between the parties.
In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
HDFC Bank
- respondent
Narendra Kumar & Anr.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090012352023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court