M/s Gupta Power Infrastructure Limited v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer Petition withdrawn by appellant counsel and dismissed accordingly. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Transfer Petition No. 07 of 2024
(Arising out of S.A. 390 of 2024 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
Order No. 02
04.10.2024
M/s. Gupta Power Infrastructure Limited & 4 Others … Appellants
-Vs-
Canara Bank & 15 Others … Respondents
Mr. Tanoy Agarwal with Mr. Rohit Bhattacharjee, Learned Counsel for Applicants
Mr. Mainak Bose, Learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Omkar Ganguly, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2/Canara Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
At the very outset, Learned Counsel for Applicants submits that he is not pressing the Transfer Petition and endorses upon the Transfer Petition to that effect.
In view of the above submission the Transfer Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondent Bank and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 04th October, 2024 01/ac
M/s. Gupta Power Infrastructure Limited
Canara Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court