Shree Ram Proteins Ltd. v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
On a diary appeal before the DRTA, Mumbai, the judgment records that appellants failed to make the required pre-deposit as directed by the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed and interlocutory applications declared infructuous. No substantive adjudication on merits is presented.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed. Interlocutory applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Appeal on Diary No. 1324/2024
Between
Shree Ram Proteins Ltd. & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Union Bank of India &Anr. …Respondent/s
Ms Neeta Pandit, i/b M/s A.R. Gupta & Associates, Advocate for Appellants.
Ms Amisha D., i/b M/s NDB Law, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 Bank.
-: Order dated: 11/07/2024:-
The appellants have not complied with the direction of this Tribunal by making the pre-deposit amount in time.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed as directed in the order.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-13
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal stands dismissed due to non-compliance with pre-deposit directions.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shree Ram Proteins Ltd.
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 271090013242024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court