Samudrala Vijaya Kumari v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for extension of time to pay court fee in an appeal before the DRT was dismissed for non-compliance of the time limit, leading to dismissal of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The application for extension of time was dismissed and the appeal was dismissed. Pending IAs disposed of accordingly and interim orders vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Application Dy. No. 66 of 2024
(Arising out of Regular Appeal Dy. No. 578 of 2023)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
08.02.2024
Smt. Samudrala Vijaya Kumari & Anr ... Appellant
-VsCanara Bank & ors ……Respondents
Mr. Shreyash Basu Dasgupta, Learned Counsel for the Appellant None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission
Dy No. 66 of 2024
Application for extension of time for paying the Court fee. Order dated 31st January, 2024 is not complied. Court fee is not paid. No application for extension of time is moved. Appeal is dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Samudrala Vijaya Kumari & Anr
- respondent
Canara Bank & ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090000662024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court