The court dismissed the regular appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant was not present on the date of hearing nor filed a vakalatnama.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 94/2016 Date: 10.09.2024
Smt. Radha Devi Vs. Indian Overseas Bank and 2 Ors.
Present: None for the appellant, Shri Maneesh Mehrotra, counsel for the respondent-Bank, None for the other respondents,
Perusal of the earlier order of this Tribunal dated 22.04.2024 shows that none was present on behalf of the appellant on that date. Today also, none is present for the appellant even in the revised reading of the cause list, therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Smt. Radha Devi
Indian Overseas Bank
Ors.
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
