The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal by withdrawal, noting that the matter had been settled between the parties. No substantive judgment was rendered.
Withdrawal of the appeal allowed; matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson M.A. No. 274/2011
In Appeal No. 178/2011
Between
Janaseva Sahakari Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Authorised Officer, Bank of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr Vishal Tambe, i/b Ms Madhuri Vaidya, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Shubham Kalbere, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 10/01/2024:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant is filing a pursis for withdrawal of the appeal since the matter has been settled between the parties.
The appeal is disposed of as withdrawal.
Chairperson
rm-11
1
Janaseva Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Authorised Officer, Bank of Maharashtra
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
