The appeal was withdrawn as the matter between the parties was reported to be settled, with the consent of both sides. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not pressed, and pending applications were declared infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Appeal No. 171 of 2017
(Arising out of S.A. 88 of 2013 of DRT-II, Kolkata)
Order No. 45
05.9.2024
Smarajit Sarkar & Another
… Appellants
-Vs-
Bank of India & 3 Others
… Respondents
Mr. Sounak Sengupta with Ms. Labani Dey, Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikder, Learned Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for Appellant, submits that the matter is settled with the Respondent Bank and accordingly endorsement, to this effect, is made on the Memo of Appeal. Mr. Pal Choudhuri also concedes to this factual situation.
In view of the above submission, the Appeal No. 171 of 2017 is dismissed as not pressed.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand dismissed, being infructuous. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondent
Bank and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 05th September, 2024 16/ac
Smarajit Sarkar and Another
Bank of India and 3 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
