Prasanta Bhattacharjee v. Axis Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the appellant as not maintainable. The court observed that the appellant failed to substantiate a claim of pending settlement discussions with any written proposal or affidavit and did not comply with a prior order regarding pre-deposit.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed; Pending I.A.s disposed of accordingly; Interim order vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Appeal Dy. No. 523 of 2024
(Arising out of SA No. 63 of 2021 in DRT, Guwahati)
Order No. 10 17.12.2024
Prasanta Bhattacharjee …….Appellants
-Vs-
The A.O. Axis Bank Ltd. & Anr.
……Respondents
Ms. Sarmistha Pal, Ms. Soumi Das, Learned Counsel
on behalf of Mr. D. Basu Roy, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable in the absence of compliance with the order for pre-deposit and without any material to substantiate the claim of pending settlement.
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for lack of maintainability.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prasanta Bhattacharjee
- respondent
The A.O. Axis Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090005232024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court