G Ananthsena Reddy and Others v. Central Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against dismissal of an application for discovery of documents by the Appellants. The Tribunal observed that the Bank produced available documents but directed it to file a supplementary affidavit with all documents already on record in the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Bank to file a supplementary affidavit with all documents already filed in the appeal before the DRT.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 948 of 2024
(Arising out of I.A. 147 of 2018 in O.A. 84 of 2006 in DRT-I, Hyderabad)
Order No. 07
16.12.2024
G. Ananthsena Reddy & 2 Others … Appellants -VsCentral Bank of India & 10 Others … Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant s
Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti, Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1/Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties at the ‘Admission’ stage and perused the records.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Appellants are entitled to discovery of documents from the Respondent Bank.
Whether the Learned DRT should make a presumption against the Bank if relevant documents in its possession are not produced.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G. Ananthsena Reddy & 2 Others
- respondent
Central Bank of India & 10 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 191090009482024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court