Mrs Hemavathy H N v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
This order addressed an application for delay condonation lacking relevant documents and refused a request for further time. Consequently, the delay application was dismissed and the underlying appeal was rejected.
What did the court decide?
IA 81/2022 dismissed for non prosecution; Appeal AIR (SA) 38/2022 rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 6th day of February, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 81/2022 (Delay)
In
AIR (SA) 38/2022
(IA 175/2017 in SR No.1804/2017 on the file of DRT-II, Bengaluru)
Between
Smt. H.N. Hemavathi W/o late P. Nagendra Kumar, R/at Door No.40, 15th Cross, 11th Main, Wilson Garden, Lakasandra Extension, Bengaluru 560 027.
…Appellant
And
- The Manager,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow an application for condonation of delay that was not supported by relevant documents.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. H.N. Hemavathi
- respondent
The Manager, Bank of Baroda, Frazer Town Branch
- respondent
Sri Sivaprasad M.V.
- respondent
Sri Subramani A.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 331090000382022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Tamilnadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd. versus The State Bank of Trivancore
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited versus Sri Gayathri Chashews
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited versus Tr Venkatachalam Chetty and Company
Smt.Kamalamma versus The Graint Merchants Co. operative Bank Ltd.