This appeal regarding an infructuous interim order was dismissed since the main special appeal was already disposed of, leaving no order as to costs.
Interim order appeal dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 2nd day of February, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
MA (SA) 24/2022
(IA 165/2022 in SA 67/2022 on the file of DRT-I, Chennai)
Between
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited,
Rep. by its Branch Manager/Authorised Officer,
Panruti Branch, No.71, Chennai Salai, Panruti 607 106. Cuddalore District.
…Appellant Bank
And
Panikkankuppam, Panruti 607 106.
…..Respondents
Counsel for Appellant Bank : M/s S. Sethuraman & Co. Counsel for R3 : M/s R. Chithiraputhiran & Co.
R1 & R2 remained ex parte.
1
ORDER
Advocate for appellant bank represented that this Appeal is preferred against a Common Order dated 6.2.2022 passed in IA 165/2022 in SA 67/2022 by Tribunal below and that main SA No.67/2022 is already disposed of and considering the same, suitable orders may be passed.
No representation for R3. R1 & R2 were already set ex parte.
Heard Ld. Counsel for appellant bank.
As main SA 67/2022 itself is disposed of, this Appeal preferred again an interim order has become infructous, hence, dismissed as infructous with no order as to costs.
Sd/-
[Justice S. Ravi Kumar] CHAIRPERSON
2
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Limited
M/s Sri Gayathri Cashews
TRVS Ramesh
Deepam Foundation
S.Ravi Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
