Application for Miscellaneous Application No. 31/2020, filed in Regular Appeal No. 91/2016 before Allahabad High Court, was dismissed as infructuous on the submission that the matter has been settled between the parties, leaving nothing to be decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.A. No. 31/2020 In Regular Appeal No. 91/2016 Date: 07.10.2024
Allahabad Bank Vs. M/s Shankar Rice Products & Ors.
Present: Shri M. K. Srivastava, counsel for the applicant, Shri Satyajeet Mukherji, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rajneesh Kesharwani, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 3,
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties, therefore, the misc. application may be dismissed as having become infructuous as there remains nothing to be decided in the present case.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Allahabad Bank
Shankar Rice Products
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
