The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal against a DRT order because the appellants filed an affidavit stating the dispute was settled and the appeal was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Application No. 04 of 2023 (Arising out of S.A. 56 of 2019 in DRT, Cuttack)
Order No. 15
13.12.2024 Maa Kiran Devi Agro Food Private Limited & 4 Others … Appellants -Vs-
Bank of Baroda & 2 Others … Respondents
Mr. Tuna Sahu (Virtual), Learned Counsel for Appellants
Mr. Dipanjan Datta with Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
An affidavit is filed by one Sri Babish Prusty, Managing Director of the Appellant, stating that the matter is settled between the parties and appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondent Bank and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 13th December, 2024 07/ac
Maa Kiran Devi Agro Food Private Limited
Bank of Baroda
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
