The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as it was not pressed by the appellant's counsel who explicitly endorsed that submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Appeal No. 60 of 2024 (Arising out of I.A. 1055 of 2024 in S.A. 200 of 2024 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
| Order No. 09 13.12.2024 |
State Bank of India … Appellant -Vs- |
|---|---|
| Medepalli Nagendramani & 2 Others … Respondents |
|
| Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri with Ms. Saswati Sikdar, Learned Counsel for Appellants |
|
| Mr. Machanapalli Srinivas (Virtual) with Mr. Sreyash Basu Dasgupta Learned Counsel for Respondents |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Mr. Soudip Pal Choudhuri, Learned Counsel for Appellant, submits that the Appellant does not want to press the present appeal. Learned Counsel endorses upon the Memo of Appeal to that effect.
In view of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondent Bank and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 13th December, 2024 09/ac
State Bank of India
Medepalli Nagendramani & 2 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
