The Appellant challenged an interlocutory order in O.A. No. 74/2009. Counsel submitted that the underlying O.A. was settled and disposed of. Consequently, this Misc. Appeal became infructuous.
Misc. Appeal stood disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 766/2017 (Stay)
In Misc. Appeal No. 60/2017
Between
M/s. Archit Organosys Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. HDFC Bank Ltd & Anr. …Respondent/s
Ms. Sonali Jain, Advocate for Appellant.
Ms. Nasrin Shaikh, Advocate for Respondents.
-: Order dated: 19/04/2024:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the parties submits that O.A. No. 74/2009 pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Mumbai (D.R.T.) has been settled between the parties in consequent to the filing of consent terms.
Given the disposal of the O.A., this Misc. Appeal which arises from an interlocutory order passed in the O.A. has become infructuous.
Hence, Misc. Appeal stand disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-22
1
M/s. Archit Organosys Ltd.
HDFC Bank Ltd & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
