This order in the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismisses an appeal for default due to the continuous absence of the appellants or their counsel, assuming lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed for default. Interlocutory applications were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No.13/2023 (WoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 1331/2022
Between
Mennem Aviation and Hospitality Ltd & Ors.. V/s.
The Authorised Officer,
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
Karvy Financial Services Ltd. & Anr.
-: Order dated: 22/04/2024:-
There is no representation for the Appellants. The matter stands posted for hearing on an application for waiver of deposit to entertain this appeal.
Because of the continuous absence of the Appellants or their counsel, it is assumed that the Appellants are not keen on prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for default.
Interlocutory applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-04
1
Mennem Aviation and Hospitality Ltd & Ors.
The Authorised Officer, Karvy Financial Services Ltd. & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
