The Delhi High Court allowed an interim application for late filing of a reply in a writ petition. The application for costs was impugned here as appeal. This order stays the stayable stay.
Application for late filing of reply allowed upon payment of ₹2,500/- as costs to the DRT Bar Association within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 270/2024 In
Appeal No. 69/2022
Between
Shreeji Metals
A partnership firm through its partner Vimalbhai K Rathod
V/s. State Bank of India & Ors.
… Appellant/s …Respondent/s
Mr Sunil A Humbre, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Omkar Kelkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 Bank. .
-: Order dated: 22/04/2024:-
The Respondent has filed an application as I.A. No. 270 of 2024 for receiving the reply out of time.
The application is allowed subject to payment of costs of ₹2,500/- to the D.R.T. Bar Association, Mumbai for the purchase of books and periodicals within a week.
Post on 30.04.2024 before the Registrar for compliance regarding costs.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-18
1
Shreeji Metals
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
