Kiran Jose v. South Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application for waiver of statutory pre-deposit and rejected the pending appeal due to the appellant's failure to comply with the earlier order directing 50% deposit.
What did the court decide?
The application for waiver of pre-deposit was dismissed, and the appeal was rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 17th day of December, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
CHAIRPERSON
IA 288/2023 (Waiver) In
AIR (SA) 9/2023
(Arising out of I.A.No.1325/2022 in S.A.299/2022 On the file of DRT-II, Ernakulam)
Between
- Kiran Jose,
Aged 45 years, S/o. Devasia joseph, Kalayathinkal Kuzhiyil House, Poovarany P.O., Kottayam, Kerala – 686 577.
- Rosamma Joseph,
Aged 72 years, W/o. Devasia Joseph, Kalayathinkal Kuzhiyil House, Poovarany P.O., Kottayam, Kerala – 686 577.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed despite non-compliance with the statutory pre-deposit order.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
KIRAN JOSE AND ORS.
- respondent
THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD.
Coram
G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090000092023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court