The Delhi High Court (legal indexing engine note: text actually from DRTA, Mumbai) hearing an application for condonation of delay, found the explanation for the delay satisfactory and condoned the three days' delay in filing the appeal.
Condonation of delay allowed; appeal taken on file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 397/2023 (CoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 1436/2022
Between
Apex India Company & Anr.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Indian Bank & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr. Radhe Agrawal, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. Shashikant Gaikwad, i/b Mr. K. Sachdev, Advocate for Respondent No.2
-: Order dated: 02/02/2024:-
I.A. No. 397/2023 is an application for condonation of three
days’ delay in filling this appeal.
The Respondents have appeared and filed their replies.
Heard both sides. On going through the affidavit, it seems that the delay has been explained properly and therefore, the delay stand condoned.
The appeal shall be taken on file if there are no defects to be cured.
Post on 19.02.2024 before the Registrar.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-13
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal is maintainable.
Apex India Company & Anr.
Indian Bank & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
