Appeal filed to challenge an order granting time extension under SARFAESI measures was dismissed in limine as the challengeable order was made by consent and thus non-challengeable under Section 20(2) of RDB Act 1993.
Appeal dismissed in limine and the underlying application remanded for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 68/2024 (WoD) In
Appeal on Diary No. 175/2024
Prakash M Rajgor & Ors.
V/s.
Between
The Authorised Officer, …Respondent/s
South Indian Bank
Mr. Sachin Kaikini, i/b Mr. Dhrumit Chauhan, Advocate for Appellants.
Ms. Hema Desai, i/b C. S Kaylegal & Association, Advocate for Respondent.
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of a praecipe filed by the Appellants for seeking urgent relief.
1
proceed with the Sarfaesi measures against the secured property.
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limine.
The application filed by the Appellant before the D.R.T. stands posted for the 12th instant and the same shall be considered on its merits.
psa-06
2
Prakash M Rajgor & Ors.
The Authorised Officer
South Indian Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
