The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application for stay of possession notice as infructuous upon acknowledgment by the respondent that the notice was issued by mistake and no steps were taken to enforce it.
The application for stay is dismissed as infructuous. The interim order is extended till the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 39/2024 (Stay)
Appeal on Diary No. 2287/2023
Between
M/s. Mahip Industries Ltd. & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorized Officer, Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd.
…Respondent/s
Mr. Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. Nikhil Salvi along with Mr Praful Chipte & Mr. Mohit S., Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 18/01/2024:-
1
dismissed.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-07
2
M/s. Mahip Industries Ltd. & Ors.
The Authorized Officer, Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
