Capital Fist Ltd. v. Ms Vino Engineering Fabricators
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellant sought permission to withdraw the delay application. Permission was accorded, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the delay application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 22nd day of February, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 776/2019 (Delay)
In
AIR (SA) 262/2019
(SA 63/2018 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Between
Capital First Limited Presently known as IDFC First Bank Limited Amarsri Building, 3rd Floor, No.455, Anna Salai, Teynampet, (Near SIET College) Chennai 600 018.
…Appellant
And
- M/s Vino Engineering fabricators Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Perumal Kanniappan, No.532/1A, Vanagaram Road, Athipet Ambattur, Chennai Tamil Nadu 600 053.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Capital First Limited (Presently known as IDFC First Bank Limited)
- respondent
M/s Vino Engineering fabricators (and others)
Coram
S. Ravi Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 331090002622019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court