M.a.Asif & Anr. v. Yes Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellate tribunal permitted the appellants to withdraw the application and rejected the appeal, as the underlying matter became infructuous due to the dismissal of the transferred order for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the application and dismissal of the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 11th Day of December, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 22/2021 (Delay) In AIR 141/2020
( Arising out of IA 354/2019 in OA 222/2018 on the file of DRT-I, Chennai)
Between
- M.A.Asif
Flat ABC, S2, Door No.3 Vallalar Nagar, Puthagaram 7th Street, Kolathur
Thiruvallur 600 099
- M. Shahul Hameed
- 13/7, G2, Golden Enclave
Subramaniasami Kovil Street
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.A.Asif and M. Shahul Hameed
- respondent
YES Bank Limited and Others
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court