Mrs a Geetha v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal declined to grant the appellant two weeks for negotiating an amicable settlement with the auction purchaser. The Tribunal confirmed the order dated 22.08.2024 of DRT-II, Chennai, holding no interference warranted and directing both parties to bear their own costs.
What did the court decide?
Order dated 22.08.2024 of DRT-II, Chennai is confirmed; no further time granted.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 11th of December, 2024
PRESENT: Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
R.A (SA): 95/2024
(SA No. 541/2023 on the file of DRT -II, Chennai)
Between
Mrs. A. Geetha, W/o Mr. Azhagar Raja, No.122/49/1, East Car Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District.
… Appellant
And
- The Authorized Officer,
- City Union Bank Limited,
- No.101, Municipal Complex,
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. A. Geetha
- respondent
City Union Bank Limited
- respondent
Mr. Saravanakumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court