Arup Ghosh v. Sundaram Home Finance Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
DART dismissed an appeal against a DRT order directing impleadment of an auction purchaser. The Tribunal found no infirmity and held the appeal lacked merit at the admission stage, confirming the lower order.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed at the admission stage; impugned order confirmed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appl. Dy. No. 868 of 2024
(Arising out of S.A. 598 OF 2021 DRT-III Kolkata) THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 04
07.10.2024 Arup Ghosh & Anr.
… Appellants
Vs.
Sundaram Home Finance Ltd. & Ors. ….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Arup Ghosh, ld. adv For Respondent :
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the records.
Instant appeal is preferred against the order dated 09.09.2024 passed by the learned DRT-III, Kolkata whereby direction was issued to the appellant to implead the auction purchaser and to collect the articles lying in the secured asset as per inventory list.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arup Ghosh & Anr.
- respondent
Sundaram Home Finance Ltd. & Ors.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court