M/S Vishnupuri Sehkari Awas Samiti v. Aryavart Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order setting objection filed by the court on procedural defaults regarding the rejoinder to the reply and affidavit of service of respondent no. 3, listing the case for future proceeding.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 464/2022 Date: 26.04.2023
Present: Shri Shresth Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Pawan Kumar Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The office report dated 25.04.2023 shows that no rejoinder has been filed by the appellant to the reply of the respondent no. 1 and no affidavit of service has been filed with regard to the service upon the respondent no. 3. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 09.08.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
- respondent
Respondent no. 1
- respondent
Respondent no. 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 091090004642022
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/ S Dimple Stone Kresar versus Bank of Baroda and Anr.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation Ltd. and Ors.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited versus Rohit Singh Raghav (Since Deceased) Represented through LRs
Union Bank of India versus M/S Prayan Ispat and Steels Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.