Urmila Satish Ganorkar and Ors. v. Bank of Maharashtra
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
J.------ ' ’ »
FARAD
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
1 ' ■' • d ~ MUMBAi
Wise Application No. ____ -of 20
In / i.Nc
I
Appeal p/No. ||g7 _ of 204?
F
* ...Appellants
ors
‘■(Advocate iSSi
• v ... ■’ ' J
Versus
»■
Respondents
’ (Advocate
J
} i 1I
Date Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar’s order I Chairperson s Orders
______
Appeal presented . by.
4^1 RS.
-Advocate for Appellant with Dji on
.
■>
1 ^07 being aggrieved byf he iniji jgned order / final order
3 ; •
1 j passed on 1 6'40^ _ jn / No.^O of JS
byDRTjT* 20 oU4rB:
1B.& F I Aur.1.993 / 18 of
■•j 1. I
. if S.A.R.FAE's.I. Act. 2002.
I
r I
Exh - 1 Appeal Memp
I
I S.O. for compliance to 30/08 )S2dv2^
I
•4
1 -
REGISTRAR
I ? 30708/2023 (Alone (^otT boVh
I ■’ p\d4 ^otT CompVonce -d > rV/o/2023
i-i
t »■
?
P.T.O.
‘4 ■■ •*
. ?.
Contd Sheet
■J
J )
|Date
nJlO/*20'Z3
06/12.r2023|o'a /ca/?o2 C|
• ^egts^.
•?
L
Office Notes, Appearances
and Registrar's order / Chairperson’s Orders
(N one Pott bo-Mn PottMcs-
P\dj _(-O7T _P-eOnOVOLl Of
O^/i^v2.0'3^3.
Ntone Fbv bo44n Pa-aU'es
pdj'Perv->ovaJ oPdePecte Yd|
|---|---|
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 271090011872023
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court