Tulsi Ram Sahu and Anr. v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous because the appellants submitted that the dispute had been settled and all dues were cleared. No order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Appearance of setlement and clearance of dues rendered the appeal infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 84/2019 Date: 05.12.2023
Tulsi Ram Sahu & Anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Raj Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the appellants, Shri Abhishek Kapariya, Advocate holding brief of Shri P. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and entire dues have been cleared, therefore, the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tulsi Ram Sahu & Anr.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090000842019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court