Manoj Kumar Pathak v. Union Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1326/2023 Date: 01.12.2023
Manoj Kumar Pathak Vs. Union Bank of India
Present: Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellant,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellant is neither borrower nor the guarantor or the mortgagor and the property, which has been mortgaged, is different from the property in question and even the order, which has been passed by the Magistrate under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act pertains to the different property, therefore, the proceeding against the appellant cannot be sustained. He further states that the appeal is maintainable and has relied upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 501 of 2020-Standard Chartered Bank Vs. MSTC Ltd.
Shri Sandeep Arora, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent-Bank and states that he has been served with the copy of appeal by the counsel for the appellant today, therefore, he seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 18.01.2024 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manoj Kumar Pathak
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090013262023
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court