The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal against non-appearance of the appellants who failed to make the mandatory pre-deposit required under the relevant order, rendering the appeal not maintainable.
Dismissal of Appeal No. 253 of 2018; a non-appearance order due to failure to make pre-deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 253 of 2018
(Arising out of S.A. 321 of 2017 in DRT-III, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
24.03.2023 Subir Bhattacharya & Another … Appellants -VsState Bank of India & Others … Respondents
None for Appellants
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None appears to represent the Appellants.
As per the order dated 11th January, 2023, Appellants were required to make pre-deposit which has not been made. Thus, the appeal is not maintainable for want of pre-deposit.
Accordingly the instant appeal, being Appeal No. 253 of 2018, is dismissed.
Pending I.A.s, if any, also stand closed.
Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 24th March, 2023 05/ac
Subir Bhattacharya & Another
State Bank of India & Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
