The DRTA recused itself from hearing the appeal due to intervening reasons and directed the Registry to seek transfer of the file to another Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
The Registry is directed to seek transfer of the matter to another Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 251/2023 (WoD)
In Appeal on Diary No. 345/2023
Between
Anil Kaljerao Babar V/s. Sangli Dist. Co-op Bank & Ors. An Advocate for the Appellant is present.
… Appellant/s …Respondent/s
An Advocate for the Respondent is present.
This Tribunal is not in a position to take up this appeal for consideration because of certain intervening reasons and hence, I recuse from hearing the Appeal. The Registry is directed to address the DFS for transfer to another Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal,
(D.R.A.T).
Post before the Registrar for immediate steps.
rm-5
Sd/Chairperson
1
Anil Kaljerao Babar
Sangli Dist. Co-op Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
