The Appellant TCTRDA. The Tribunal allowed the stay application, set aside the ex-parte order, and directed the Respondents to file a reply. The matter was listed for future hearing.
Ex-parte order set aside; liberty granted to file reply; matter posted for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 419/2023
In
Misc. Appeal No. 46/2023
Between
Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Shankarao Bajirao Shelke & Ors.
…Respondent/s
Mr. Charles D’Souza, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Jay Mehta, i/b Mr. Ronak Shah, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 & 2
-: Order dated: 27/06/2023:-
I.A. No. 419/2023 is an application filed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to set aside the ex-parte order passed against them. There is no objection from the Appellant to allow this application.
Hence, the application is allowed and ex-parte order running against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is set aside and they are at liberty to file a reply.
Post on 26.07.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-30
1
Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd.
Shankarao Bajirao Shelke
S/o. Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
