R.Subramanian v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application, set aside a default order, and restored multiple inter-connected applications including IA 397/2020 to 401/2020 and AIR 811/2017 for disposal. Costs borne by parties.
What did the court decide?
Default order set aside; IA 397/2020 to AIR 811/2017 restored for disposal; parties to bear own costs.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Misc.Appl. 20/2022 in A.IR:811/2017
R.Subramanian V/S Bank Of Baroda &Ors
05/10/2023
Order pronounced (vide separate Order) in open court. The Miscellaneous Application 20/2022 is allowed and default Order dated 24.06.2022 is set aside. Office shall restore IA 397/2020 (Delay in Restoration), IA 398/2020 (Restoration), IA 399/2020 (Delay in Representation), IA 400/2020 (Delay), IA 401/2020 (Waiver) and AIR 811/2017 to file, for their disposal in accordance with law. Both parties shall bear their own costs.
Sd/-
Chair Person
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.Subramanian
- respondent
Bank Of Baroda & Ors
Coram
Chair Person
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 331090008112017
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/s. Richros Builders rep by its Sole Proprietor B. Antony Raj versus The Chief Manager / Authorized Officer under Sarfaesi Act Uco Bank
Tamilnadu Adi Dravidar Housing and Development Corporation Ltd. versus The State Bank of Trivancore
Our Lady of Lourdes Educational Trust rep. by its Managing Trustee versus The Authorized Officer under Sarfeasi Act Varthana Finance Private Limited
Kotak Mahindra Bank versus Mrs K Valarmathi