Sruti Ranjan Ray v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellants sought restoration of an appeal dismissed due to failure to make pre-deposits. The court accepted an undertaking to deposit 25% of the claimed amount by a specified date and listed the matter for further proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Listing of the matter on 16.01.2023 pending deposit of 25% of the claimed amount.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: KOLKATA CAMP COURT AT DRT, CUTTACK MA Diary No.441 of 2022 (Arising out of Diary No.259 of 2020) THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
05.01.2023
Sruti Ranjan Ray & others
…. Appellants
-Vrs.-
The Chief Manager, State Bank of India& Others. …. Respondents Mr. R. K. Rout, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
Mr. B. N. Udgata, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. S. S. Rao, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.5
None for the Respondents No.3 & 4
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
- Learned Counsel Shri R. K. Rout, for the appellants present. Learned Counsel Shri B. N. Udgatafor the Respondents No.1 and 2 present. Learned Counsel Shri S.S. Rao for the Respondent No.5 present.
- Heard learned Counsel for the appellants as well as learned Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 2 and 5.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sruti Ranjan Ray & others
- respondent
The Chief Manager, State Bank of India & Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 191090004412022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court