Sruti Ranjan Ray v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This order arises from the dismissal of applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and waiver. The court addressed pending High Court directions regarding deposit and status quo maintenance. The matter was listed for further hearing pending deposit by the appellant.
What did the court decide?
Matter listed for further hearing at Kolkata dated 09/09/2022. Appellant permitted to deposit at own risk if complying with High Court order.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL: KOLKATA CAMP COURT AT DRT, CUTTACK M.A.Diary No.441 of 2022
(Arising out of Diary No.259 of 2020 in SA No.38 of 2017 in DRT-Cuttack) THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
06.09.2022
Sruti Ranjan Ray & others …. Appellants
-Vrs.State Bank of India, SARB, Cuttack & Others
…. Respondents
Mr. R. K. Rout, Learned Counsel for the Appellants Mr. B. N. Udgata, Learned Counsel for the Respondents No.1 and 2
Mr. S. S Rao, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.5
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL:
Learned Counsel Shri R. K. Rout for the appellants present. Learned Counsel Shri B. N. Udgata for the Respondents No.1 and 2 present. Learned Counsel Shri S. S. Rao for the Respondent No.5 present.
Heard learned Counsels for the parties. Peruse the record.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to remit the matter to the High Court Bench direction following the appeal against the dismissal of Section 5 application and waiver application.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sruti Ranjan Ray & others
- respondent
State Bank of India, SARB, Cuttack & Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 191090004412022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court