Smt S Uma Rani and Ors. v. Chennuri Muralidhar Rao
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 486 of 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 26.09.2023 | Smt. S. Uma Rani & 2 Others … Appellants -Vs- Chennuri Muralidhar Rao & 2 Others ... Respondents |
|---|---|
| Mr. Arijit Bardhan with Mr. Rishabh Dutta Gupta, |
|
| Learned Counsel for the Appellants |
|
| Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned | |
| Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 3 |
|
| Mr. Debasish Chakrabarti with | |
| Ms. Sharmistha Pal, Learned |
|
| Counsel for Respondent No.2/Bank |
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 257 of 2023
Substitution application for substitution of legal representatives of Respondent No. 1, Chennuri Muralidhar.
Counsel for Respondent submits that State Bank of India has filed an Appeal, being Appeal No. 10 of 2020, wherein the proposed legal representatives of Respondent No. 1, viz. Chennuri Muralidhar, have filed their Vakalatnama. Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel, submits that the proposed legal representatives shall also file Vakalatnama in this appeal within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Uma Rani
- respondent
Chennuri Muralidhar Rao
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court