Smt Punita Mathur v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable due to the appellant's failure to deposit the mandatory 25% amount by the deadline of 02.08.2023.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for want of mandatory pre-deposit of 25% of the amount due.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy.No 606/2022 01.08.2023
Smt. Punita Mathur Vs Bank of Baroda
The Hon’ble Court vide order 27.04.2023, directed the Appellant to deposit 25% of the amount due prior to the next date fixed i.e. 02.08.2023, failing which, the Appeal shall stand dismissed as not maintainable for want of mandatory pre- deposit without further reference to Hon’ble Court.
As per office report dated 01.08.2023 no amount has been deposited by the Appellant till date, as stipulated by the Hon’ble Court.
In view of non compliance of the above order dated 27.04.2023, passed by the Hon’ble Court, the Appeal is treated to have been dismissed.
(Registrar)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal satisfies the mandatory pre-deposit order dated 27.04.2023.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Punita Mathur
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 091090006062022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court