Shri Mahesh Son of Udernomal Bhateja v. Bank of Baroda
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No.603/2023 (EoT) In
Appeal on Diary No. 1226/2023
Between
Mahesh S/o Undernomal Bhateja … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of Baroda, through its Authorised Officer/Chief Manager & Anr. …Respondent/s
Ms Sonali Jain, i/b Mr Rajesh K Thakkar, Advocate for Appellant. Ms Radhika J. Agrawal, Advocate for Respondent Bank No.1 Bank. Mr Meghnath Navlani, Advocate for Auction Purchaser.
-: Order dated: 04/09/2023:-
The Appellant was directed to deposit a sum of ₹2 crores as predeposit by 01.09.2023 and the Appellant has filed an application for an extension of time stating certain reasons to grant further time to deposit the amount.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank and also the Ld. Counsel appearing for the auction purchaser has vehemently opposed this application and seeks time to file their replies.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant time to the appellant for deposit of interim insistence amount.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mahesh S/o Undernomal Bhateja
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 271090012262023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Nishad Fazil F
- Order 2 — this page · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court