Shri Mahesh Son of Udernomal Bhateja v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The court termed an application for extension of time to deposit a predeposit of ₹2 crores and directed the reply to be filed within two weeks, postponing the hearing to 15.09.2023. No decision on the extension was rendered.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No.603/2023 (EoT) In
Appeal on Diary No. 1226/2023
Between
Mahesh S/o Undernomal Bhateja … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of Baroda, through its Authorised Officer/Chief Manager & Anr. …Respondent/s
Ms Sonali Jain, i/b Mr Rajesh K Thakkar, Advocate for Appellant. Ms Radhika J. Agrawal, Advocate for Respondent Bank No.1 Bank. Mr Meghnath Navlani, Advocate for Auction Purchaser.
-: Order dated: 04/09/2023:-
The Appellant was directed to deposit a sum of ₹2 crores as predeposit by 01.09.2023 and the Appellant has filed an application for an extension of time stating certain reasons to grant further time to deposit the amount.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank and also the Ld. Counsel appearing for the auction purchaser has vehemently opposed this application and seeks time to file their replies.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mahesh S/o Undernomal Bhateja
- respondent
Bank of Baroda and anr. - wide البنك من البانكينغ
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ashok Menon
- Order 2 · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court