M/S .Sark Spice Produce Pvt. Ltd. v. South Indian Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
This order records the rejection of an appeal due to failure to comply with a conditional order requiring a statutory deposit within the extended timeframe.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 334/2023 in A.IR:712/2023
M/S Sark Spice Produce Pvt Ltd &Ors V/S The South Indian Bank Ltd &Anr
09/11/2023
This appeal is coming up today for reporting compliance of statutory deposit. As per conditional order dated 3.10.2023 passed in IA 334/2023(Waiver), appellants shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,77,73,499/- on or before 17.10.2023 and failure to deposit the same would result in dismissal of appeal. However, appellants without complying the said order filed IA 423/2023 seeking extension of time and sought 10 weeks time for compliance of conditional order dated 3.10.2023. However, request of advocate for petitioners/appellants for grant of three weeks time was considered and time was extended for deposit of amount till 8.11.2023 and posted to this date for compliance.
Today Advocate Shri Periasamy represented that amount could not be mobilized and another extension petition could not be filed in time as counsel on record for petitioners/appellants is not well and sought further time for compliance. Once time is extended only on request of appellants, I am not inclined to grant any further time.
Therefore, Appeal AIR (SA) 712/2023 is rejected, by giving effect to orders dated 3.10.2023 & 18.10.2023 for non compliance of statutory deposit.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/S Sark Spice Produce Pvt Ltd &Ors
- respondent
The South Indian Bank Ltd &Anr
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090007122023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S. Pooja timber and Saw Mill , Partnership firm Rep By Its Partners Jethalal D Patel, Mangalaben J Patel, Bhavik Patel versus Karnataka Bank Limited
M s Ipac Paper Boards India Private Limited Rep by its Director Vikram Balaraman versus Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Ms Ipac Paper Boards India Private Limited Rep by its Director Vikram Balaraman versus Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
V.N.Ashok kumar versus Tata capital housing finance Ltd. & or