Uco Bank v. Saraswati Bastralay
Case brief
What is this about?
An order listing the appeal for hearing and granting time to file affidavits to the parties.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 97 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
14.03.2023
UCO Bank
… Appellant -VsSaraswati Bastralay
… Respondent Mr. Rathin Dey, ld. Counsel for the appellant.
Mr. D. Karmakar, ld. Counsel with Mr. A. Nandi and Mr. S.Ojha, ld. counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit in opposition filed by the respondent is taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and granted one week time to file supplementary affidavit with advance copy to the appellant who may file rejoinder, if any, within three weeks thereafter.
List on 12.06.2023 for hearing of appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
Saraswati Bastralay
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court