Canara Bank v. Ms Rajeswari Dairy and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal treated an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Relying on Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No(s) 3/2020, the Tribunal condoned the delay and registered the appeal. It listed the parties for hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 08 of 2022) (Arising out of S.A. No. 457 of 2018 in DRT Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
14.03.2023
Canara Bank … Appellant -VsM/s Rajeswari Dairy & anr ….Respondents
Ms. Aparajita Ghosh, Learned Counsel Mr. Souvik Ghosh, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Ms. Swarnali Dutta, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2/auction purchaser
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. No. 4 of 2022 application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal. Impugned order was passed on 4th August, 2021 while the Appeal was filed on 24th January, 2022. In view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No(s) 3/2020, delay in filing the Appeal is duly covered under that judgment. Accordingly, delay in filing the Appeal is condoned. Let the Appeal be registered as a regular appeal by providing a regular Appeal number. Respondent No. 1 and 2 are represented. They may file the
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the appeal is condonable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act considering the Apex Court judgment in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No(s) 3/2020.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Canara Bank
- respondent
M/s Rajeswari Dairy & anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court