Disposed
Union Bank of India v. M/S Niyamatulla and Sons and 5 Ors.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/96/2015
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Regular Appeal No. 96/2015 Date: 10.05.2023
Present: Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the appellant, Shri Arun Pratap Singh, counsel for the respondents no. 1, 2, 3 & 6,
The office report dated 09.05.2023 shows that the reply of the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3, 6/1, 6/2 & 6/4 has been filed, but no rejoinder has been filed. The said report reveals that as per tracking report, the notice sent to the respondent nos. 5/1 and 5/3 indicates “incomplete report” and notice sent to the respondent no. 5/2 has returned back with endorsement “Insufficient address”. The report further reveals that the respondent nos. 4 and 6/3 are same person, but till date no reply has been filed. Let the same be filed by the next date, failing which appropriate order shall be passed.
Let the appellant take fresh steps within 10 days for service of notice upon the unserved respondents by publication in the newspaper having wide circulation in the area. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
List this case on 11.08.2023 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct fresh steps for service by publication on unserved respondents.
Whether to list the case for service on a future date.
Justice R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court