Sri P v. Ramana Moorthy v Arcil & Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 88 of 2023
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
04.09.2023
Sri P.V. Ramana Moorthy ... Appellants -VsM/s ARCIL & Ors. ... Respondent
Mr. A.K. Dhandhania, Learned Senior Counsel, Ms. Mitul Chakrabarty, Learned Counsel Ms. Payel Nath, Learned Counsel Ms. Anindita Maity, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Mr. Jishnu Saha, Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Sarathi Dasgupta, Learned Counsel Mr. Pratik Ghose, Learned Counsel, Mr. Avishek Roy Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for the Respondent ARCIL Mr. N. Srinivas, Learned Counsel Ms. Deboshree Das, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit filed by the Respondent No. 2 filed today is taken on record. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 submits that he will not file any opposition to the same.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that three lease deeds and photographs of the property are being filed which were not filed before the Learned DRT. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 submits that he does not wish to file any objection to the Application. Accordingly, additional evidence is taken on record. Learned Counsel for
Parties & counsel
- other
The HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
- appellant
P.V. Ramana Moorthy
- respondent
M/s ARCIL & Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court