Chintala Suresh Kumar v. Ao Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order granting time to file opposition in a debt recovery appeal fixed for hearing on 17 July 2023.
What did the court decide?
Granted four weeks time to file opposition by Respondent No. 2. Rejoinder to be filed within two weeks thereafter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 79 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
| 18.04.2023 | Chintala Another The Aut Bank & 4 |
Suresh Kuma … Appe -Vs- horised Officer, Others … Resp |
r & llants Canara ondents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Deb Counsel f |
jit Mukherjee, or the Appellant |
Learned s |
|
| Ms. Apa Counsel 1/Bank |
rajita Ghosh, for Responde |
Learned nt No. |
Mr. M. Narasimha Rao, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Affidavit of Service filed by the Appellant is taken on record.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 prays for and is granted four weeks time to file opposition with copy to the Appellant. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. Copy of the paper book is served today.
List on 17th July, 2023 for hearing of appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chintala & Another
- respondent
The Authorised Officer
- respondent
Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court